• Intensive care medicine · Oct 1996

    Comparative Study

    Analysis of the accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Comparison with intermittent thermodilution and Fick cardiac output measurement.

    • L Jacquet, G Hanique, D Glorieux, P Matte, and M Goenen.
    • Saint-Luc University Hospital, Cardio-thoracic Intensive Care Unit, Brussels, Belgium.
    • Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct 1;22(10):1125-9.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of cardiac output measurement obtained by a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) pulmonary artery catheter compared to intermittent thermodilution (TCO) and the direct Fick method.DesignProspective open trial.SettingUniversity hospital, intensive care unit.Patients23 patients (15 surgical, 8 non-surgical) were monitored with the Intellicath pulmonary catheter. Cardiac output was evaluated by the three methods every 4 to 6h as long as the pulmonary artery catheter was necessary (8-96 h).ResultsThe correlation coefficient between CCO and TCO was 0.92, no systematic bias was observed, and the relative error increased from 13.9% for a cardiac output of 21/min to 23.7% for an output of 101/min. When comparing CCO and Fick, the correlation coefficient was 0.89, no bias was detected, and the relative error increased from 20.4% for outputs of 21/min to 27.2% for outputs of 101/min.ConclusionsCCO provides clinically acceptable measurements. At high cardiac outputs, the difference with other methods increases and the results must be cautiously interpreted.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…