• J D Tobias, G W Holcomb, J W Brock, W M Morgan, N O'Dell, S Lowe, and G E Rasmussen.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
• Am J Anesthesiol. 1995 Jul 1;22(4):193-7.

AbstractThe authors prospectively evaluated the efficacy of caudal epidural block versus local infiltration combined with ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block for analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic inspection of the peritoneum. During standardized anesthetic care, 24 children were randomized to Group I (caudal epidural block with 1.2 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine) or to Group II (local infiltration with an ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower at all four evaluation points in Group I than in Group II. Patients in Group I had a significantly decreased requirement for supplemental intravenous fentanyl. Intra-operative requirements for isoflurane were decreased in Group I. The expired concentration of isoflurane was 0.4 +/- 0.1 (mean +/- SEM) in Group I and 1.5 +/- 0.3 in Group II. Time to extubation was 3.8 +/- 0.5 minutes in Group I and 8.2 +/- 1.1 minutes in Group II. The time from arrival in the postanesthesia care unit until discharge home was 113 +/- 3 minutes in Group I and 152 +/- 11 minutes in Group II. Caudal epidural block was more effective than local infiltration in controlling pain after herniorrhaphy with laparoscopy in children and resulted in earlier discharge home.

38 keywords...

hide…