• J. Neurosci. Methods · Sep 2015

    Reliable estimation of nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds.

    • Michael Brun Jensen, Biurrun ManresaJoséJCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, Room E1-202, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark., and Ole Kæseler Andersen.
    • Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, Room E1-202, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark. Electronic address: mbj@hst.aau.dk.
    • J. Neurosci. Methods. 2015 Sep 30; 253: 110-5.

    BackgroundAssessment of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is frequently applied to probe the excitability level of the spinal nociceptive circuitry. In humans, the NWR threshold (NWR-T) is often estimated by applying electrical stimulation over the sural nerve at the lateral malleolus. Such stimulation may be associated with substantial pain and discomfort rendering completion of the assessment infeasible.New MethodAs an alternative to sural nerve stimulation, NWR-Ts were also estimated by electrical stimulation at the arch of the foot. Failure-rates and test-retest reliability of these two procedures were evaluated. A fully-automated interleaved up-down staircase procedure was used to estimate the NWR-T for both stimulation sites. NWRs were detected from EMG measured over the biceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscles, respectively. A total of three repeated measures were performed in two different sessions to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the two methods using Bland-Altman agreement analysis.ResultsThe failure rate of NWR-T estimation based on electrical stimulation of the sural nerve (29%) was substantially higher than when the NWR was elicited by stimulation at the arch of the foot (5%).Comparison With Existing MethodThe analysis of test-retest reliability indicated that the two methods for NWR-T estimation were equally reliable for within-session comparisons, but stimulation at the arch of the foot enabled NWR-T estimation with superior between-session reliabilityConclusionsThese results support a paradigm shift within NWR-T estimation favoring stimulation at the arch of the foot.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…