• Lena M Napolitano and Howard L Corwin.
• Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
• Crit Care Clin. 2004 Apr 1;20(2):255-68.

AbstractThis article has evaluated the published data regarding the efficacy of RBC transfusions in the critically ill. Taken together, these studies generally support conservative RBC transfusion strategies in critical care to reduce the risk of transfusion-related adverse effects. The TRICC trial has established the safety ofa restrictive transfusion strategy, suggesting that physicians could minimize exposure to allogeneic RBCs by lowering their transfusion threshold. Further research will add to the generalizability of this study and explore the possible mechanism to explain why RBC transfusions do not improve outcomes in the critically ill. Additional studies will be necessary to determine the effects of RBC storage time and the presence of allogeneic leukocytes in allogeneic RBC. The following conclusions are evident: 1. RBC transfusion does not improve tissue oxygen consumption consistently in critically ill patients, either globally or at the level of the micro-circulation. 2. RBC transfusion is not associated with improvements in clinical outcome in the critically ill and may result in worse outcomes in some patients. 3. Specific factors that identify patients who will improve from RBC transfusion are difficult to identify. 4. Lack of efficacy of RBC transfusion likely is related to storage time, increased endothelial adherence of stored RBCs, nitric oxide binding by free hemoglobin in stored blood, donor leukocytes, host inflammatory response, and reduced red cell deformability.

8 keywords...

hide…