• Int. J. Cardiol. · Jul 2003

    Prognostic importance of the quantification of myocardial viability in revascularized patients with coronary artery disease and moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction.

    • Jaroslav Meluzín, Jan Cerný, Ladislav Groch, Milan Frélich, Frantisek Stetka, Lenka Spinarová, and Roman Panovský.
    • First Department of Internal Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anna Hospital, Pekarská 53, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic. jaroslav.meluzin@fnusa.c
    • Int. J. Cardiol. 2003 Jul 1;90(1):23-31; discussion 31-2.

    AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium in revascularized patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. To quantify the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium, low-dose dobutamine echocardiography was performed. The wall motion was scored using a 16-segment model. The dysfunctional segments were defined as viable if they exhibited functional improvement of at least 1 grade with any dose of dobutamine, or only worsening with dobutamine infusion. Two hundred and twenty patients were revascularized and followed-up for a mean period of 33+/-23 months (range, 0-86) for cardiac-related death and hospitalization for heart failure. Standard follow-up echocardiography was performed 3-6 months after revascularization. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified six dysfunctional but viable segments as the optimal cutoff value for discriminating patients with and without risk of cardiac events. Thirty-eight patients exhibited a large amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium (>or=6 segments, group A), 103 patients had a small amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium (2-5 segments, group B), and 79 patients were found to have dysfunctional myocardium irreversibly damaged (group C). Similar baseline left ventricular ejection fractions of 36+/-4, 34+/-5, 35+/-5% in groups A, B, and C increased to 46+/-6% (P<0.01 versus baseline and versus groups B and C), to 39+/-5% (P<0.01 versus baseline and group C), and to 36+/-7% (P<0.01 versus baseline), respectively, after revascularization. The greatest functional improvement after revascularization in group A patients was accompanied by a lower frequency of cardiac events during follow-up (1 vs. 27 in group B, P<0.01, and versus 18 in group C, P<0.01) and by a better cardiac event-free survival according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P<0.01 versus groups B and C, respectively). In conclusion, in revascularized patients with coronary artery disease and moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction, the presence of >or=6 dysfunctional but viable segments identifies patients with the best prognosis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.