• L K K Teoh, R Grant, J A Hulf, W B Pugsley, and D M Yellon.
• The Hatter Institute for Cardiovascular Studies, UCL, Grafton Way, WC1E 6DB, London, UK.
• Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jun 1;10(3):251-5.

AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare ischemic preconditioning (IPC) with two established methods of myocardial protection, namely cold crystalloid cardioplegia and intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation (ICCF), in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This was a prospective randomised study. Thirty CABG patients were randomised to receive: (a) St Thomas' cardioplegia solution no. 2; (b) ICCF; or (c) IPC (two 3-min periods of ischemia with 2-min of reperfusion). Surgery was performed under standardised conditions by one surgeon (WBP). The primary endpoint was cardiac troponin T release during the first 72 h after surgery. Mean troponin T at 72 h was significantly lower in the IPC group (0.5 microg/l; p=0.05, ANOVA) compared with the cardioplegia and ICCF groups (2.1 and 1.3 microg/l respectively). This suggests that ischemic preconditioning is superior at limiting myocardial necrosis during CABG, but there is no difference between cold crystalloid cardioplegia and intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation.

25 keywords...

hide…