• Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2001

    Review

    Screening for lung cancer.

    • R L Manser, L B Irving, C Stone, G Byrnes, M Abramson, and D Campbell.
    • Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Evaluation Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050. ManserRL@mh.org.au
    • Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2001 Jan 1(3):CD001991.

    BackgroundThe effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with chest radiography, sputum cytology or spiral CT has not been established.ObjectivesTo determine whether screening for lung cancer using regular sputum examinations or chest radiography or CT chest reduces lung cancer mortality.Search StrategyElectronic databases, bibliographies, hand searching of a journal and discussion with experts were used to identify published and unpublished trials.Selection CriteriaControlled trials of screening for lung cancer using sputum examinations, chest radiography or CT chest.Data Collection And AnalysisIntention to screen analysis was performed. Where there was significant statistical heterogeneity relative risks were reported using the random effect model, but for other outcomes the fixed effect model was used.Main ResultsSeven trials were included (6 randomised controlled studies and 1 non-randomised controlled trial) with a total of 245,610 subjects. There were no studies with an unscreened control group. Frequent screening with chest x-rays was associated with an 11% relative increase in mortality from lung cancer compared with less frequent screening (RR 1.11, CI: 1.00-1.23). A non statistically significant trend was observed to reduced mortality from lung cancer when screening with chest x-ray and sputum cytology was compared with chest x-ray alone (RR 0.88, CI:0.74-1.03). Several of the included studies had potential methodological weaknesses. There were no controlled studies of spiral CT.Reviewer's ConclusionsThe current evidence does not support screening for lung cancer with chest radiography or sputum cytology. Frequent chest x-ray screening might be harmful. Further, methodologically rigorous trials are required.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.