• Br J Anaesth · Feb 2012

    Multicenter Study

    Cost analysis of re-exploration for bleeding after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

    • R Svedjeholm, U Alström, L-Å Levin, E Ståhle, and O Friberg.
    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anaesthesia, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. u.a@surgsci.uu.se
    • Br J Anaesth. 2012 Feb 1;108(2):216-22.

    BackgroundRe-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery is an indicator of substantial haemorrhage and is associated with increased hospital resource utilization. This study aimed to analyse the costs of re-exploration and estimate the costs of haemostatic prophylaxis.MethodsA total of 4232 patients underwent isolated, first-time, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during 2005-8. Each patient re-explored for bleeding (n=127) was matched with two controls not requiring re-exploration (n=254). Cost analysis was based on resource utilization from completion of CABG until discharge. A mean cost per patient for re-exploration was calculated. Based on this, the net cost of prophylactic treatment with haemostatic drugs for preventing re-exploration was calculated.ResultsPatients undergoing re-exploration had higher exposure to clopidogrel before operation, prolonged stays in the intensive care unit, and more blood transfusions than controls. The mean incremental cost for re-exploration was €6290 [95% confidence interval (CI) €3408-€9173] per patient, of which 48% [€3001 (95% CI €249-€2147)] was due to prolonged stay, 31% [€1928 (95% CI €1710-€2147)] to the cost of surgery/anaesthesia, 20% [€1261 (95% CI €1145-€1378)] to the increased number of blood transfusions, and <2% [€100 (95% CI €39-€161)] to the cost of haemostatic drugs. A cost model, at an estimated 50% efficacy for recombinant activated clotting factor VIIa and a 50% expected risk for re-exploration without prophylaxis, demonstrated that to be cost neutral, prophylaxis of four patients needed to result in one avoided re-exploration.ConclusionsThe resource utilization costs were substantially higher in patients requiring re-exploration for bleeding. From a strict cost-effectiveness perspective, clinical interventions to prevent haemorrhage might be underutilized.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…