• Y T Hallström, U Lindblom, and B A Meyerson.
• Department of Neurology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
• Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar 1;80(2):126-39.

AbstractIn 7 awake patients with neuropathic lower extremity pain, spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were elicited from the non-painful leg by electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve and mechanical stimulation of the hallux ball. Recording was made epidurally in the thoraco-lumbar region by means of an electrode temporarily inserted for trial of pain-suppressing stimulation. In response to peroneal nerve stimulation, two major SEP complexes were found. The first complex consisted, as has been described earlier, of an initial positivity (P12), a spike-like negativity (N14), a slow negativity (N16) and a slow positivity (P23). The second complex consisted of a slow biphasic wave, conceivably mediated by a supraspinal loop. Both complexes had a similar longitudinal distribution with amplitude maxima at the T12 vertebral body. The SEP evoked by mechanical hallux ball stimulation had a relatively small amplitude, and there was no significant second complex. The relationship between stimulus intensity and SEP amplitude was negatively accelerating. The longitudinal distribution of spinal SEP was compared with the somatotopic distribution of paresthesiae induced by stimulation through the epidural electrode. It was found that stimulation applied at the level of maximal SEP generally induced paresthesiae in the corresponding peripheral region. Therefore, spinal SEP may be used as a guide for optimal positioning of a spinal electrode for therapeutic stimulation when implanted under general anesthesia. An attempt was made to record the antidromic potential in the peroneal nerve elicited from the dorsal columns by epidural stimulation. The antidromic response was, however, very sensitive to minimal changes of stimulus strength and body position of the patient, and was also contaminated by simultaneously evoked muscular reflex potentials. Thus, peripheral responses evoked by epidural stimulation appeared too unreliable to be useful for the permanent implantation of a spinal electrode for therapeutic stimulation.

21 keywords...

hide…