• F Heid, B Jage, and J Jage.
• Johannes Gutenberg University, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mainz, Germany. heid@uni-mainz.de
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Apr 1;23(4):346-50.

Background And ObjectiveSeveral new techniques and agents (e.g. ropivacaine) have been introduced in regional anaesthesia to improve patients outcome and safety. The beneficial effects on patient outcome are clear with these techniques, however, no information is available about their pattern and frequency of use in clinical practice. This study presents data concerning the current practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany.MethodsA questionnaire was sent to every German anaesthesia department (n = 1381). Questions focused on the frequency and range of regional anaesthetic procedures employed, with attention also to the organizational structural of the individual institution.ResultsSix hundred and sixty-seven questionnaires were returned anonymously, representing a return rate of 48.3%. In hospitals with less than 200 beds, the number of regional anaesthetics was markedly higher compared to large hospitals with more than 400 beds. In contrast, small hospitals tended to provide only basic techniques of regional anaesthesia, whereas larger hospitals implemented more advanced techniques. Bupivacaine remains the most commonly used long-lasting local anaesthetic. Staff structure was also different in small departments - patient care was performed by board certified anaesthesiologists while residents were responsible for the patients in larger departments.ConclusionsIn small hospitals a majority of board certified anaesthesiologists rely on basic regional anaesthesia techniques. In large departments some consultants provide the entire spectrum of regional anaesthesia, with the majority of cases transferred to the residents responsibility. These results indicate the strong need to improve residency programs with regard to regional anaesthesia.

9 keywords...

hide…