• M Taniguchi, J Nadstawek, U Pechstein, and J Schramm.
• Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Bonn, Germany.
• Neurosurgery. 1992 Nov 1;31(5):891-7; discussion 897.

AbstractTwo anesthetic regimens for monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during intracranial aneurysm surgery were compared. Eighty-four sequential cases of intracranial aneurysms were operated on employing SEP monitoring. The first group of 22 cases was anesthetized with "balanced anesthesia" and the second group of 62 cases received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) consisting of propofol and alfentanil. In the TIVA group, the amplitude of early cortical SEP responses (N20-P25, or P40-N50) was significantly higher than that of responses in the balanced anesthesia group. In median nerve SEPs, the averaged amplitude of N20-P25 was 3.22 microV with TIVA and 1.69 microV with balanced anesthesia (P = 0.006). Similarly, posterior tibial nerve SEPs showed a P40-N50 response of 1.85 microV and 1.00 microV, respectively (P = 0.017). The superior signal-to-noise ratio obtained with TIVA allowed more frequent and reliable intraoperative SEP recordings than was possible with balanced anesthesia, resulting in rapid and reliable feedback for the surgeon. In 19% of median nerve SEPs recorded with TIVA, the cortical responses were over 5 microV in amplitude, so that reproducible N20-P25 responses were obtainable by averaging only 10 to 50 serial responses, that is, two to three recordings per minute. The higher amplitude of posterior tibial nerve SEPs recorded with TIVA made monitoring during surgery for anterior communicating artery aneurysms possible in all cases. This was not always the case with balanced anesthesia. The late deflection of median nerve SEPs (N30) was more frequently observed with TIVA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

37 keywords...

hide…