• Southern medical journal · Dec 1997

    Prospective assessment of triage in an urban emergency department.

    • R D Waldrop, D E Harper, and C Mandry.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Earl K. Long Medical Center, Baton Rouge, La 70805, USA.
    • South. Med. J. 1997 Dec 1;90(12):1208-12.

    BackgroundThis study examined the effectiveness of a triage system based on patient complaints, medical history, vital signs, and triage nurse impression. Measurements included recognizing patients needing admission, in correlating with disposition, and its effectiveness in all age groups.MethodsData were collected prospectively on all patients coming to a general emergency department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital from October 1, 1992, through November 30, 1992. Data included assigned triage acuity, disposition waiting time to physician examination, and disposition, as well as return to the ED within 2 weeks. The patients were divided into age groups: 0 to 16 years, 17 years to 25 years, 25 years to 50 years, 50 years to 65 years, and >65 years of age.ResultsThere were five patients (n = 4,993, 0.4%) who were triaged nonemergently and subsequently admitted. The sensitivity and specificity of an assigned triage 3 acuity assignment in correlating with lack of admission were 99% and 56%, respectively. Mean waiting time to physician examination was 61 +/- 14 minutes for triage 1, 129 +/- 19 for triage 2, and 182 +/- 22 for triage 3. Mean time to admission from sign-in was 246 +/- 10 minutes for triage 1 and 372 +/- 16 minutes for triage 2.ConclusionsThis triage system accurately correlated with disposition and determined waiting time to examination.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.