• J. Antimicrob. Chemother. · Oct 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Microbiological surveillance during selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD)

    • G L Saunders, J M Hammond, P D Potgieter, H A Plumb, and A A Forder.
    • Department of Medical Microbiology, Groote Schurr Hospital, Observatory, South Africa.
    • J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1994 Oct 1;34(4):529-44.

    AbstractThe use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as prophylaxis against nosocomial respiratory tract infection remains controversial, largely because of concerns that, in the long term, it may promote the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains. This report describes the results of surveillance cultures and susceptibility testing undertaken during the course of a 2-year, double-blind study of the efficacy of SDD which was conducted in a respiratory intensive care unit (ICU). Surveillance specimens from the alimentary tract and trachea were obtained from each patient on admission and then twice weekly until 48 h after discharge from the unit. Specimens were cultured semiquantitatively and organisms from morphologically distinct colonies were identified by standard methods; the susceptibilities of these isolates were determined by the disc diffusion method. Five thousand, nine hundred and sixty surveillance samples from 239 patients were processed in this way. Compared with the placebo group, SDD caused a significant reduction in the incidence of colonization of the alimentary tract with aerobic Gram-negative bacilli (AGNB), and Candida spp. were almost totally eliminated. The incidence of colonization with enterococci increased in both groups, while the incidence of both colonization of the alimentary tract with strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and infection caused by these organisms increased in the SDD group. Acinetobacter spp. were the most common bacteria associated with unit-acquired colonization and lower respiratory tract infection in both groups. The acquisition of strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and cefotaxime- and/or tobramycin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was significantly greater in the placebo group than in the SDD group, although tobramycin-resistant strains of Proteus, Morganella and Providencia spp. were isolated from three of 114 patients receiving SDD. The use of SDD did not lead to an overall increase in antibiotic resistance amongst the AGNB usually associated with ICU-acquired infection. However, colonization with strains which were either resistant to one or more of the antibiotic components of the regimen or which were not inhibited by the regimen was observed and may subsequently lead to infection.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…