• E Knoche, W Dick, E Traub, and I Maier.
• Reg Anaesth. 1982 Oct 1;5(4):73-7.

AbstractA questionnaire was sent to 260 women who in 1979 had undergone a caesarean section under either epidural or general anaesthesia. Those women who had an epidural for their caesarean section were on average very well informed about the procedure. In contrast, those who had been given a general anaesthetic felt that they had been badly or inadequately informed. Over 90% of the patients of both the epidural and the general anaesthetic groups described the type of anaesthesia which they had received as "very good" to "adequate". In the epidural group, 80% of the patients described the experience of the birth as very intense. Headache, back pain and other complaints such as abdominal pain and wound pain were significantly more frequent in the general anaesthetic as compared to the epidural group. 85.8% of the women given an epidural said that they would choose the same again for a future caesarean, 12.1% would not. Of the group given a general anaesthetic, 29.9% said that in the future they would choose an epidural, and 62.3% that they would prefer to have a general anaesthetic again. The Apgar score at one minute, and the umbilical artery pH values of the newborn of the epidural group were significantly better than those of the general anaesthetic group, whereas at 5 and 10 min the Apgar scores of the babies of both groups showed no differences.

17 keywords...

hide…