• Am J Ther · Sep 2010

    Review

    Less is more: the recent history of neuraxial labor analgesia.

    • Richard W Hong.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. rhong@mednet.ucla.edu
    • Am J Ther. 2010 Sep 1;17(5):492-7.

    AbstractLabor analgesia researchers have pursued better and safer ways to provide pain relief in labor. Although some pharmacologic investigations have focused on alternative mechanisms to target and medications to employ, a large part of the recent obstetric anesthesiology literature has contributed toward the safety and efficacy of techniques dependent on traditional therapeutics, specifically local anesthetics given through a neuraxial anesthetic technique. Investigators have worked to demonstrate and remove doubts that neuraxial anesthesia can be a safe method of labor analgesia. Pharmacodynamic studies during the last 3 decades have revealed ways to achieve adequate analgesia with minimal doses and correspondingly minimal risks. Dose-sparing opiate adjuncts to local anesthetics are now commonplace. To avoid excessive dosages, clinical up-down sequential allocation experiments identified the minimum amounts of local analgesia needed. Modifications to the administration of drug allowed total doses to be further reduced. This historical overview highlights some of these important advances in the present and recent past of neuraxial labor analgesia, and it traces how desired outcomes are being achieved with less and less total drug.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.