• Glenn Gade, Ingrid Venohr, Douglas Conner, Kathleen McGrady, Jeffrey Beane, Robert H Richardson, Marilyn P Williams, Marcia Liberson, Mark Blum, and Richard Della Penna.
• Department of Internal Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA. Douglas.A.Conner@KP.Org
• J Palliat Med. 2008 Mar 1;11(2):180-90.

BackgroundPalliative care improves care and reduces costs for hospitalized patients with life-limiting illnesses. There have been no multicenter randomized trials examining impact on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and subsequent health care costs.ObjectiveMeasure the impact of an interdisciplinary palliative care service (IPCS) on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and cost of care for 6 months posthospital discharge.MethodsMulticenter, randomized, controlled trial. IPCS provided consultative, interdisciplinary, palliative care to intervention patients. Controls received usual hospital care (UC).Setting And SampleFive hundred seventeen patients with life-limiting illnesses from a hospital in Denver, Portland, and San Francisco enrolled June 2002 to December 2003.MeasuresModified City of Hope Patient Questionnaire, total health care costs, hospice utilization, and survival.ResultsIPCS reported higher scores for the Care Experience scale (IPCS: 6.9 versus UC: 6.6, p = 0.04) and for the Doctors, Nurses/Other Care Providers Communication scale (IPCS: 8.3 versus UC: 7.5, p = 0.0004). IPCS patients had fewer intensive care admissions (ICU) on hospital readmission (12 versus 21, p = 0.04), and lower 6-month net cost savings of $4,855 per patient (p = 0.001). IPCS had longer median hospice stays (24 days versus 12 days, p = 0.04). There were no differences in survival or symptom control.ConclusionsIPCS patients reported greater satisfaction with their care experience and providers' communication, had fewer ICU admissions on readmission, and lower total health care costs following hospital discharge.

21 keywords...

hide…