• J Schnoor, S Macko, I Weber, and R Rossaint.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen, Germany, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. joerg.schnoor@gmx.de
• Anaesthesia. 2004 Aug 1;59(8):817-21.

AbstractPressurised infusion devices may have only limited capability to detect and remove air during pressurised infusions. In order to assess pressure infusion systems with regard to their actual air elimination capabilities four disposable pressure infusion systems and fluid warmers were investigated: The Level 1 (L-1), Ranger (RA), Gymar (GY), and the Warmflo (WF). Different volumes of air were injected proximal to the heat exchanger and the remaining amount of air that was delivered at the end of the tubing was measured during pressurised infusions. Elimination of the injected air (100-200 ml) was superior by the RA system when compared to L-1 (p < 0.01). The GY and WF systems failed to eliminate the injected air. In conclusion, air elimination was best performed by the RA system. In terms of the risk of air embolism during pressurised infusions, improvements in air elimination of the investigated devices are still necessary.

16 keywords...

hide…