• E Monaca, N Fock, M Doehn, M Winterhalter, and F Wappler.
• Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstrsse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf. enrico.monaca@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
• Anaesthesist. 2010 Apr 1;59(4):319-26.

BackgroundTooth damage during anaesthesia could be reduced by using tooth protectors during endotracheal intubation. The effectiveness of different models was investigated using an upper jaw model.MethodA total of 6 individual adaptable dental protectors (Endoragard and Camo, with wax or silicone filling, respectively, Beauty pink dental wax with and without tissue inserts) were examined in three different categories. The upper jaw was covered with each dental shield and then loaded with a force of 150 N via a blade of a laryngoscope. Subsequently, force reduction was measured in axial as well as horizontal directions. Furthermore, the reduction in oral view was determined by measuring the thickness of each dental shield with a micrometer.ResultsThe combination of Camo and silicone achieved the maximum horizontal force reduction value (39.2 N). Endoragard and silicone achieved the best axial value (21.6 N). Beauty pink wax had the thinnest dental shield (2.8 mm), whereas the combination of Camo and silicone gave the most limited view inside the oral cavity (3.8 mm).ConclusionPreformed dental shields are useful for reducing the force applied to the teeth and potentially reducing the probability of tooth damage during laryngoscopy. However, the shield with the highest force reduction capability is relatively large and expensive which makes general use almost impossible. The model Beauty pink was slightly less force reducing and could be considered as an inexpensive and yet effective tool for clinical assignment.

20 keywords...

hide…