• Critical care medicine · May 2012

    Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock.

    • Vanina S Kanoore Edul, Carolina Enrico, Bruno Laviolle, Alejandro Risso Vazquez, Can Ince, and Arnaldo Dubin.
    • Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    • Crit. Care Med.. 2012 May 1;40(5):1443-8.

    ObjectiveThe microcirculation of septic patients has been characterized only semiquantitatively. Our goal was to characterize the sublingual microcirculation in healthy volunteers and patients with septic shock quantitatively. Our hypotheses were that 1) hyperdynamic blood flow is absent in septic shock; 2) nonsurvivors show more severe alterations than survivors; and 3) quantitative and semiquantitative microcirculatory parameters have a similar performance.DesignProspective, observational study.SettingTeaching intensive care unit in a university-affiliated hospital.SubjectsTwenty-five normal volunteers and 25 patients with septic shock.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsThe sublingual microcirculation was evaluated by means of sidestream dark field imaging. Semiquantitative and quantitative microcirculatory parameters were determined through the use of applied software. Septic patients showed decreased perfused capillary density (13.2±4.4 mm/mm² vs. 16.6±1.6 mm/mm²), proportion of perfused capillaries (0.78±0.23 vs. 1.00±0.01), microvascular flow index (2.15±0.61 vs. 2.97±0.03), and red blood cell velocity (830±183 µm/sec vs. 1332±187 µm/sec) along with increased heterogeneity flow index (1.64±1.14 vs. 0.25±0.19) compared with controls. No differences were found in total capillary density (16.9±2.2 vs. 16.7±1.6). Only 4% of capillaries analyzed showed red blood cell velocities>75th percentile of the velocities of the normal volunteers. The nonsurvivors exhibited decreased perfused capillary density, proportion of perfused capillaries, and microvascular flow index along with increased heterogeneity flow index compared with the survivors. The correlations between microvascular flow index and proportion of perfused capillaries, total capillary density and number of grid-crossing capillaries, and red blood cell velocities and microvascular flow index gave high R values (0.92, 0.65, and 0.52, respectively; p<.0001 for all).ConclusionsThe main characteristics of sublingual microcirculation in patients with septic shock are hypoperfusion and increased flow heterogeneity. Hyperdynamic microvascular blood flow was not found. Nonsurvivors showed more severe alterations than survivors. Quantitative and semiquantitative microcirculatory variables displayed similar behaviors.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…