-
Minerva anestesiologica · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: 1% versus 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine].
- F Gallo, A Alberti, A Fongaro, M G Negri, A Carlot, L Altafini, and S Valenti.
- Ospedale di Dolo, Dolo, Venezia.
- Minerva Anestesiol. 1996 Jan 1;62(1-2):9-15.
AimTo compare the quality of anesthesia produced by the intrathecal administration of equivalent doses of 0.5% and 1% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarian section.Experimental DesignA prospective, comparative and randomised clinical study.SettingAnesthesia Unit-Non-university civil hospital.Patients50 patients undergoing elective or emergency cesarian section randomly assigned to two groups of 25 patients each.SurgeryAfter prehydration, subarachnoid access was achieved through space L2-L3 or L3-L4 using a 24G Sprotte's needle with patients in right hand lateral decubitus. Patients in group A were injected with 1.25 ml of 1% hyperbaric bupivacaine and those in group B with 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg). Patients were positioned immediately in partial decubitus on their left hand sides and ephedrine infusion, or if required i.v. bolus, was commenced to counter hypotension (SAP < 80% basal).MeasurementsECG, pulse measurement, arterial pressure with non-invasive method, metameric level of analgesia (pin prick), motor block of lower limbs (Bromage's scale), time lapsed between induction of anesthesia and extraction of neonate, Apgar score, quantity of ephedrine used, duration of surgery, respiratory complications, insufficient analgesia, resolution of motor block, any postspinal cephalea.Statistical AnalysisVariance analysis, Student's t-test, chi 2.ResultsBoth solutions guaranteed satisfactory intraoperative analgesia in 96% of cases. No statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups relating to the maximum duration of analgesia, the extent of motor block, induction times and regression, incidence of complications.ConclusionsNo important difference was observed in the quality of the anesthesia obtained using the intrathecal administration of equivalent doses of 1% and 0.5% solutions of hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarian section. In view of the possible relationship between the neurotoxicity of local anesthetics and the concentration of the solution used for spinal anesthesia, it is to be hoped that less concentrated solutions of hyperbaric bupivacaine will be introduced in Italy compared to the 1% solution currently available.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.