• Man-Tang Qiu, Fu-Qing Lin, Shu-Kun Fu, Heng-Bin Zhang, Hui-Hua Li, Li-Ming Zhang, and Quan Li.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, China.
• CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 May 1;18(5):426-32.

AimsThis meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the three most common drug regimens of bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: high-dose bupivacaine (≥10 mg, HB), low-dose bupivacaine (<10 mg, LB) and combination of low-dose bupivacaine and opioids (LBO).MethodsDatabases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched (updated on October 30, 2011). Primary endpoints were the incidence of intraoperative hypotension and analgesia efficacy. Pooled risk ratio (RR) or standard mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A RR <1 indicates that LB or LBO regimen is associated with less intraoperative complications and better anesthesia or analgesia efficacy.ResultsA total of 11 randomized controlled trials including 605 parturients were analyzed. Results of this meta-analysis showed that compared with HB regimen, LB regimen decreased the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.96) with less satisfactory analgesia (fixed model, RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.14-1.98). LBO regimen significantly reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33-0.82) with reliable analgesia efficacy (RR = 2.56, 95% CI: 0.77-8.48).ConclusionCompared with conventional HB regimen and LB regimen, LBO regimen not only reduced intraoperative hypotension but also provided reliable analgesia. Therefore, LBO regimen should be considered as the preferred drug combination for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section.© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

20 keywords...

hide…