• R J Roberge, R R Ivatury, W Stahl, and M Rohman.
• Am J Emerg Med. 1986 Mar 1;4(2):129-35.

AbstractIn 18 months, 44 patients underwent thoracotomy in an emergency department (ED) for penetrating thoracic injuries. Of 14 patients resuscitated, seven (50%) survived, and all were neurologically intact. Patients were classified according to the quality of signs of life in transit or upon arrival at the ED. Identical survival rates of 29% were noted for patients in Group I (profound shock) and in Group II (agonal), with survival at 14% for individuals in Group III ("dead" on arrival). There were no survivors among patients in Group IV ("dead" on the scene), and ED thoracotomy, in the authors' opinion, is fruitless in this group. In Groups I, II, and III, total salvage from cardiac injuries was six of 24 patients (25%), and for those with non-cardiac injuries, it was one of 11 (9%). The rate of survival from cardiac stab wounds in Groups I, II, and III, was five of 16 (31%) and one of eight (13%) for gunshot wounds. Five of the seven survivors (71%) arrived at the ED by rapid transport without the benefit of any pre-hospital life support. Patient classification appears to be a valuable tool in evaluating the benefit of ED thoracotomy. The neurological status of all survivors and pertinent transportation data should be included in all future studies of ED thoracotomy. "Scoop and run" in the urban setting with rapid transport capability may be superior to pre-hospital stabilization of victims of penetrating thoracic trauma.

27 keywords...

hide…