• Christopher R Carpenter, Kennon Heard, Scott Wilber, Adit A Ginde, Kirk Stiffler, Lowell W Gerson, Neal S Wenger, Douglas K Miller, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Geriatric Task Force.
• Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA. carpenterc@wustl.edu
• Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 1; 18 (6): 644654644-54.

BackgroundGeriatric adults represent an increasing proportion of emergency department (ED) users and can be particularly vulnerable to acute illnesses. Health care providers have recently begun to focus on the development of quality indicators (QIs) to define a minimal standard of care.ObjectivesThe original objective of this project was to develop additional ED-specific QIs for older patients within the domains of medication management, screening and prevention, and functional assessment, but the quantity and quality of evidence were insufficient to justify unequivocal minimal standards of care for these three domains. Accordingly, the authors modified the project objectives to identify key research opportunities within these three domains that can be used to develop QIs in the future.MethodsEach domain was assigned one or two content experts who created potential QIs based on a systematic review of the literature, supplemented by expert opinion. Candidate QIs were then reviewed by four groups: the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Geriatric Task Force, the SAEM Geriatric Interest Group, and audiences at the 2008 SAEM Annual Meeting and the 2009 American Geriatrics Society Annual Meeting, using anonymous audience response system technology as well as verbal and written feedback.ResultsHigh-quality evidence based on patient-oriented outcomes was insufficient or nonexistent for all three domains. The participatory audiences did not reach a consensus on any of the proposed QIs. Key research questions for medication management (three), screening and prevention (two), and functional assessment (three) are presented based on proposed QIs that the majority of participants accepted.ConclusionsIn assessing a minimal standard of care by which to systematically derive geriatric QIs for medication management, screening and prevention, and functional assessment, compelling clinical research evidence is lacking. Patient-oriented research questions that are essential to justify and characterize future QIs within these domains are described.© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

17 keywords...

hide…