• Anaesthesia · Dec 1992

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Continuous extradural infusion of lignocaine 0.75% vs bupivacaine 0.125% in primiparae: quality of analgesia and influence on labour.

    • R Milaszkiewicz, N Payne, B Loughnan, A Blackett, N Barber, and F Carli.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex.
    • Anaesthesia. 1992 Dec 1;47(12):1042-6.

    AbstractWe studied 86 primiparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy and labour requesting extradural analgesia in labour. All the women were over 36 weeks of gestation with a cephalic-presenting singleton fetus. The women were allocated randomly to two groups: group A, who received an extradural infusion of lignocaine 0.75%, after an initial dose of 10 ml of lignocaine 1.5%, and group B, who received an infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% after an initial dose of 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%. All the women had their labour actively managed. Assessment of analgesia during labour and delivery, and the requirements for additional top-ups were noted, as were mode of delivery, requirement for oxytocic augmentation and incidence of fetal distress. Maternal and umbilical cord plasma concentrations of lignocaine were measured at delivery in 12 women receiving extradural lignocaine. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the mode of delivery, incidence of fetal distress, fetal heart rate abnormalities, or Apgar scores of the babies. Women in the bupivacaine group had a significantly better quality of analgesia during both the first and second stages of labour (p = 0.0005) and required fewer top-ups than those in the lignocaine group. However, the requirement for oxytocin augmentation during the first and second stages of labour was significantly less in the lignocaine group (p = 0.004). Similarly, the duration of the second stage was shorter compared with the bupivacaine group. In spite of high plasma concentrations of lignocaine, no side effects were noted in either mothers or babies.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…