• Jui-Kun Chiang and Yee-Hsin Kao.
• Department of Family Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
• Support Care Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;23(4):1049-55.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare health-care expenditures and survival of these terminally ill patients receiving or not receiving hospice care in their last month of life.MethodsUsing Taiwan's National Health Insurance Claims Database, we analyzed hospitalizations, OPD visits, associated costs, and survival. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of high cost.ResultsWe identified 3850 liver cancer patients who died during the 1997-2011 study period, 644 (16.6 %) of whom were hospice care patients. No significant difference was found in mean survival time between the hospice and non-hospice groups (1.77 ± 2.44 vs. 1.84 ± 2.37 years, p = 0.217). The mean health-care expenditures per person were US$2370 ± 3421 and US$2072 ± 1900 (p = 0.130). A total of 385 patients (10 %) received high-cost care (above US$5422) using 38.6 % of the total health-care expenditures spent on the entire population. The significant predictors of high costs were non-hospice care [odds ratio (OR) = 3.06, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.09-4.60], days of admission [risk increase per admission day being (OR = 1.19, 95 % CI 1.17-1.21)], admission into an intensive care unit (OR = 3.17, 95 % CI 1.94 to 5.15), use of ventilator (OR = 3.54, 95 % CI 1.91-6.52), cancer therapy (OR = 1.82, 95 % CI 1.33-2.48), hemodialysis (OR = 2.62, 95 % CI 1.07-6.02), and higher socioeconomic status (OR = 1.65, 95 % CI 1.10-2.45).ConclusionHospice care did not significantly affect survival, and hospice patients had lower per-patient expenditures and were less likely to require high-cost medical care than their non-hospice counterparts.

27 keywords...

hide…