• Transplant. Proc. · Mar 2006

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Spinal analgesia for the postoperative period in renal donors.

    • Z Bigat, N Hadimioglu, Z Ertug, N Boztug, O Erdogan, and A Demirbas.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, Akdeniz University, Medical Faculty, Antalya, Turkey. zekiyebigat@hotmail.com
    • Transplant. Proc. 2006 Mar 1;38(2):392-5.

    BackgroundTo provide postoperative analgesia by spinal anesthesia, we compared the quality of analgesia and side effects of two doses of morphine added to ropivacaine in kidney donors.Materials And MethodsThirty renal donors underwent nephrectomy under standard general anesthesia. After the operation, the patients were randomly allocated into two groups of intrathecal doses for spinal anesthesia: the 0.5 group (n = 15) received a total volume of 4 mL including 0.5 mg morphine, 10 mg ropivacaine, and 0.9% NaCl, and the 0.3 group (n = 15), a total volume of 4 mL including 0.3 mg morphine, 10 mg ropivacaine, and 0.9% NaCl. After extubation, an intravenous (IV) morphine protocol was initiated by a patient-controlled analgesia pump to provide sufficient spinal analgesia.ResultsIn the 0.3 group, the IV morphine consumption was significantly higher, namely, 14.60 +/- 7.57 times versus 4.60 +/- 10.14 times for the 0.5 group (P = .005). The total amount of morphine was 7.80 +/- 5.40 mg in the 0.5 group and 13.53 +/- 5.30 mg in the 0.3 group (P < .05). Postoperative side effects of nausea and vomiting were higher among the 0.3 group (P < .05).ConclusionsIn the 0.5 group, the quality of analgesia was better than in the 0.3 group. The need for IV morphine was less in the 0.5 group. Also, side effects like nausea and vomiting were less, so better analgesia in the postoperative period was obtained with the 0.5 mg morphine solution.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…