• West Afr J Med · Oct 2008

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Caesarean section outcome in eclamptic patients: a comparison of infiltration and general anaesthesia.

    • S Fyneface-Ogan and S A Uzoigwe.
    • Obstetric Anesthesiology Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Edith Wolfson Medical Centre, 62 Halohamim Street, Holon, Israel. soglonye@yahoo.com
    • West Afr J Med. 2008 Oct 1;27(4):250-4.

    BackgroundEclamptic patients undergoing caesarean delivery present extreme management problems for both obstetricians and anaesthetists. These problems reflect a poor maternal and perinatal outcome.ObjectiveTo determine outcomes following the use of infiltrative anaesthesia (gLA) compared with general anaesthesia (gGA) in eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section.MethodsEclamptic patients scheduled for emergency caesarean section were prospectively studied. They were randomised into two groups to receive either infiltration with local anaesthetic or general anaesthesia for caesarean section. The protocol used for this study included clinical and sociodemographic data, chest examination prior to administration of anaesthesia, maternal and perinatal outcome, duration of maternal hospital stay and intraoperative blood pressure measurement.ResultsThere were a total of 76 eclamptic patients in the study. There were no significant differences between the infiltration and general anaesthesia groups with regard to clinical and bio-socio-demographic parameters. Fourteen (40.0%) newborns in the gLA had lowerApgar scores in the first minute than 27 (73.0%) in the gGA group. Five (14.3%) newborns were stillbirths in gLA while 2 (5.4%) were found in the gGA. Twenty-one (60.0%) in gLA had Apgar scores e"8 compared to 10 (27.0%) in the gGA. The duration of hospital stay was longer in the gGA (17.1+/-4.1 days) than the gLA (13.0+/-1.6 days) with a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001). There were five (12.5%) maternal deaths in the gGA and two (5.0%) in the gLA. Intraoperatively, the mean arterial pressure and mean systolic pressure at skin incision were consistently and significantly higher in the gGA group than in gLA group.ConclusionLocal infiltrative anaesthesia appears to have a better maternal and perinatal outcome than general anaesthesia for eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.