• Winfried Meissner, Swantje Mescha, Judith Rothaug, Sibylle Zwacka, Antje Goettermann, Kristin Ulrich, and Alexander Schleppers.
• Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany. meissner@med.uni-jena.de
• Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Dec 1; 105 (50): 865-70.

IntroductionAcute postoperative pain management is still far from satisfactory despite the availability of high-quality guidelines and advanced pain management techniques.MethodsAn outcome-oriented project called QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management) was developed, consisting of standardized data acquisition and an analysis of quality and process indicators.ResultsAfter validation of the questionnaire, a total of 12 389 data sets were collected from 30 departments in six participating hospitals. Improved outcomes (reduction in pain intensity) were observed in four of the six hospitals. The most painful operations, in the patients' judgment, were traumatological and orthopedic procedures, as well as laparoscopic appendectomy. Traditional process indicators, such as routine pain documentation, were only poorly correlated with outcomes.DiscussionQUIPS shows that outcomes in postoperative pain management can be measured and compared in routine clinical practice. This may lead to improved care. QUIPS reveals which operations are the most painful. Quality improvement initiatives should use as few resources as possible, measure the quality of the outcomes, and provide rapid feedback. Structural and process parameters should be continuously reevaluated to determine their suitability as indicators of quality.

4 keywords...

hide…