-
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi · Jan 2012
[Clinicians' opinions on receiving the advance directives of terminal-stage patients vary according to the age of respondents].
- Ken-ichi Arita and Yasuhiko Ikegami.
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic Bomb Survivors Hospital.
- Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2012 Jan 1;49(3):318-24.
Aim And MethodsWe distributed 282 questionnaires to doctors to ascertain their opinions on obtaining the advance directives regarding the end-of-life treatment of patients at the terminal stage. We received 136 (48%) responses.ResultsA total of 62% of the respondents stated a desire for patients to indicate their advance directives "if at all possible". Only 36% stated that the need for advance directives "depended on the circumstances". A total of 80% of doctors aged under 40 wished patients to provide advanced directives "if at all possible", while 59% of doctors over 61 wanted advanced directives "depending on the circumstances" (p=0.008). A large number of doctors stated a desire for patients to indicate their preference in writing, particularly directives regarding the "use of a ventilator to prolong life" (76%) or the "use of artificial nourishment through a gastric fistula etc. as part of a proactive approach to sustaining life" (67%). Regarding the optimal timing of this declaration, 59% chose "at the first diagnosis of a terminal illness", and 47% chose "at the diagnosis of a chronic illness", regardless of whether it could become terminal. Of those respondents under 40, 32% believed that doctors should strictly follow the patients' advance directives, while only 11% of doctors over 61 years old believed the same. There was a statistically significant relationship between aging and dealing with advance directives of patients in the terminal stages of illness (p=0.002).ConclusionThese results suggest that doctors under 40 years of age should focus on how to correctly interpret the wishes of the patients expressed in the directives, while doctors over 61 should concentrate on the importance of the clinical application of advance directives, and how to balance the need to make qualified medical decisions on treatment in compliance with the wishes of end-stage terminal patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.