• Spine · Jun 2016

    The Feasibility of Two Screws Anterior Fixation for Type II Odontoid Fracture Among Arabs.

    • Yousef Marwan, Osama Rabie Kombar, Osama Al-Saeed, Aljarrah Aleidan, Ahmed Samir, and Ali Esmaeel.
    • *Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada †Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Al-Razi Orthopaedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait ‡Department of Radiology, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait §Department of Radiology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt ||Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait ¶Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
    • Spine. 2016 Jun 1; 41 (11): E643-6.

    Study DesignRetrospective, cross-sectional study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of two screws anterior fixation of the odontoid process among Arab adults.Summary Of Background DataAnterior screw fixation is the treatment of choice for type II odontoid fractures. In order to perform the procedure safely, the diameter of the odontoid process should be wide enough to allow for the placement of one or two screws.MethodsA retrospective review of 156 computed tomography scans of the cervical spine was done. The included patients were Arabs, adults (at least 18 years old), and had no evidence of upper cervical spine trauma, deformity, infection, tumor, or surgery. The minimum external transverse diameter (METD), minimum internal transverse diameter (MITD), minimum external anteroposterior diameter (MEAD), and minimum internal anteroposterior diameter (MIAD) of the odontoid process were measured. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered as the cutoff level of statistical significance.ResultsOur study included 94 (60.3%) males and 62 (39.7%) females. The mean age of the subjects was 37.8 ± 16.9 years (range 18-85). The mean values of the METD, MITD, MEAD, and MIAD were 8.7 ± 1.0 mm, 6.0 ± 1.1 mm, 10.3 ± 1.0 mm, and 7.4 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. Men had larger diameters compared to women. This was statistically significant for METD (P = 0.035) and MEAD (P < 0.001). The METD was <9.0 mm in 95 (60.9%) subjects, while the MITD was <8.0 mm in 153 (98.1%) subjects. These findings were not significantly different between males and females.ConclusionTwo screws anterior fixation of type II odontoid fracture is not feasible among the majority of Arabs.Level Of Evidence3.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…