• Menno V Huisman, Daniel J Quinlan, Ola E Dahl, and Sam Schulman.
• Department of General Internal Medicine-Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
• Circ Cardiovasc Qual. 2010 Nov 1;3(6):652-60.

BackgroundDabigatran and rivaroxaban are novel oral anticoagulants approved for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. However, information assessing clinically important efficacy and bleeding outcomes of these 2 new agents versus low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) is lacking.Methods And ResultsWe separately pooled efficacy and safety data from 6 phase III randomized trials (18 405 participants) comparing equivalent durations of treatment with enoxaparin (40 mg once daily [od] or 30 mg twice daily) versus dabigatran (220 mg od) or versus rivaroxaban (10 mg od) after hip or knee arthroplasty. Odds ratios (OR) for individual outcomes were calculated for each trial and were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Compared with dabigatran, enoxaparin had a similar risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism plus all-cause mortality (0.9% versus 1.1%; OR, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.31; I²=76%) and bleeding (5.0% versus 5.6%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; I²=0%). Compared with rivaroxaban, enoxaparin had a 2-fold higher risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism plus all-cause mortality (1.2% versus 0.6%; OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.17; P<0.001; number needed to treat, 167; I²=0%) but demonstrated a significant lower risk of bleeding (2.5% versus 3.1%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; P=0.049; number needed to harm, 167; I²=0%).ConclusionsIn patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, enoxaparin and dabigatran showed similar rates of efficacy and bleeding. Enoxaparin was less effective than rivaroxaban but had a lower risk of bleeding. These results may have important implications for the choice of prophylactic agent in major joint arthroplasty.

36 keywords...

hide…