• Dis. Colon Rectum · Jul 2012

    Meta Analysis Comparative Study

    Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast-track perioperative care.

    • Ming-zhe Li, Long-bin Xiao, Wen-hui Wu, Shi-bin Yang, and Shou-zhi Li.
    • Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
    • Dis. Colon Rectum. 2012 Jul 1;55(7):821-7.

    BackgroundBoth laparoscopic surgery and fast-track perioperative care have demonstrated advantages in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections. It is unclear whether there is an additive effect by combining these 2 procedures.ObjectiveThe study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the randomized evidence to compare laparoscopic with open colorectal surgery within fast-track perioperative care.Data SourcesPubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases were electronically searched (January 1985 to August 2011).Study SelectionRandomized clinical trials compared laparoscopic with open colorectal resections within fast-track programs.InterventionInvestigators independently reviewed articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality according to standardized criteria.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes measured were postoperative hospital stay, overall hospital stay, readmission rate, morbidity, and mortality.ResultsThree trials were considered suitable for meta-analysis. A total of 171 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 142 had open surgery. Meta-analysis showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery had shorter postoperative hospital stays (weighted mean difference -1.06; 95% CI, -2.06 to -0.06, z = 2.08, p = 0.04) and shorter overall hospital stays (weighted mean difference -2.04; 95% CI, -3.50 to -0.58, z = 2.74, p < 0.01). No significant differences were noted for readmission rate (OR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.26-1.12, z = 1.65, p = 0.10), morbidity (OR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.42-1.10, z =1.58, p = 0.11), and mortality (OR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09-1.18, z =1.70, p = 0.09). No publication bias and no significant heterogeneity were noted.LimitationsThis study was limited because of its small sample size.ConclusionsLaparoscopic colorectal surgery has shorter postoperative hospital stays and overall hospital stays than open surgery within fast-track perioperative care. There is no significant difference with respect to readmission rate, morbidity, and mortality. Because the number of patients included in the present trials was small, further studies should be undertaken to confirm these findings.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…