• Masafumi Oda, Shinji Kito, Tatsurou Tanaka, Ikuko Nishida, Shuji Awano, Yuko Fujita, Katsura Saeki, Shinobu Matsumoto-Takeda, Nao Wakasugi-Sato, Manabu Habu, Shinya Kokuryo, Masaaki Kodama, Takeshi Kaneuji, Daigo Yoshiga, Ikuya Miyamoto, Shun Nishimura, Yoshihiro Yamashita, Kenshi Maki, Kazuhiro Tominaga, Izumi Yoshioka, Toshihiro Ansai, and Yasuhiro Morimoto.
• Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan. rad-mori@kyu-dent.ac.jp.
• BMC Oral Health. 2013 Jan 1;13:54.

BackgroundRecent studies suggest that tonsilloliths are clinically related to halitosis and tonsillar abscess. Based on our empirical knowledge, tonsilloliths are relatively commonly encountered in daily clinical practice. It has been reported that the detection rate of tonsilloliths was under 24% in previous reports, although experience suggests otherwise. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of tonsilloliths using computed tomography (CT). In addition, the possible causes of low detection rates on panoramic radiographs were evaluated based on comparisons between CT images and panoramic radiographs in order to elucidate the limitations of visualizing the area around the palatine tonsils on panoramic radiographs.Methods482 pairs of CT images and panoramic radiographs were retrospectively assessed with respect to the presence and characteristics of tonsilloliths. In addition, the causes in cases of disagreement between the two modalities were analyzed.ResultsThe detection rate of tonsilloliths was 46.1% using CT scans, unlike previous reports. The characteristics of tonsillolith were dot-like figures with about 300-500 Hounsfield units within the palatine tonsil under the soft palate. The most common length of tonsilloliths was about 3 or 4 mm. As the subjects aged, the detection rate increased gradually. A significant difference in the tonsillolith detection rate was found between the over and under 40-year-old groups (p < 0.0001). However, the detection rate of tonsilloliths was only 7.3% on panoramic radiographs. A significant correlation was observed between the detection rate of tonsilloliths on panoramic radiographs and CT number (Spearman r = 0.429), size, (Spearman r = 0.318), and number of tonsilloliths (Spearman r = 0.333).ConclusionThe present results suggest that tonsilloliths are relatively more common than previously suggested. However, panoramic radiographs detect only a small percentage of palatine tonsilloliths. The low detection rates on panoramic radiographs might be related to the degree of calcification, size, and number of tonsilloliths.

34 keywords...

hide…