• Levent Sahin, Rauf Gul, Ayse Mizrak, Hayati Deniz, Mehrican Sahin, Senem Koruk, Mehmet Cesur, and Sıtkı Goksu.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Gaziantep University, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey. drlsahin@hotmail.com
• J. Vasc. Surg. 2011 Sep 1;54(3):749-53.

ObjectiveBrachial plexus block offers several advantages when creating vascular access for hemodialysis. However, no controlled studies have directly evaluated arteriovenous fistula (AVF) blood flow in patients anesthetized by this method. We compared the effects of ultrasound-guided, infraclavicular brachial plexus block and local infiltration anesthesia on blood flow in the radial artery and AVF during the early and late postoperative periods.MethodsSixty patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group, which received infraclavicular brachial plexus block (IB), or to a control (C) group that received local infiltration anesthesia. Blood flow in the distal radial artery was measured before and after IB or infiltration anesthesia. AVF flow during the early and late postoperative period was evaluated using duplex ultrasound imaging. The rates of primary fistula failure were also compared.ResultsAfter anesthesia, preoperative radial arterial flow was 56 ± 8.6 mL/min in group IB vs 40.7 ± 6.11 mL/min in group C (P < .0001). Blood flow in the fistula, measured in mL/min at 3 hours, 7 days, and 8 weeks postoperatively, was also greater in group 1B vs group C, respectively, at 69.6 ± 7.9 vs 44.8 ± 13.8 (P < .001), 210.6 ± 30.9 vs 129 ± 36.1 (P < .001), and 680.6 ± 96.7 vs 405.3 ± 76.2 (P < 0.001).ConclusionWhen used for AVF access surgery, infraclavicular brachial plexus block provides higher blood flow in the radial artery and AVF than is achieved with infiltration anesthesia.Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…