• N Sasaoka, M Kawaguchi, K Yoshitani, H Kato, A Suzuki, and H Furuya.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan. ne6n-ssok@asahi-net.or.jp
• Br J Anaesth. 2005 Feb 1;94(2):243-6.

BackgroundIlioinguinal and iliohypogastric (IG-IH) nerve block has been widely used in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. This technique may provide insufficient analgesia for intraoperative management as the inguinal region may receive sensory innervation from genitofemoral nerve. We proposed that addition of a genitofemoral nerve block might improve the quality of analgesia.MethodsNinety-eight children undergoing inguinal hernia repair were assigned randomly to receive either IG-IH nerve block (Group I) or IG-IH and genitofemoral nerve blocks (Group II). Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before surgery (control), after skin incision, at sac traction and at the end of surgery. Postoperative analgesic requirements and incidence of complications were recorded until discharge.ResultsAt sac traction, SAP and HR were significantly higher in Group I (P<0.05), and the incidence of episodes of increased HR was also significantly higher in Group II (29 vs 12%, respectively, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in SAP and HR at other time points, postoperative analgesic requirements or incidence of complications between the groups.ConclusionsThe benefit of the additional genitofemoral nerve block to IG-IH nerve block was limited only to the time of sac traction without any postoperative effect. This suggests there is little clinical benefit in the addition of a genitofemoral nerve block.

22 keywords...

hide…