• Amy C Plint, Antonia S Stang, Lisa A Calder, and Priorities in Patient Safety Research in Emergency Medicine Consensus Panel.
• Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9 Canada ; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9 Canada ; The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8 L1 Canada.
• Int J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan 1;8:1.

BackgroundPatient safety in the context of emergency medicine is a relatively new field of study. To date, no broad research agenda for patient safety in emergency medicine has been established. The objective of this study was to establish patient safety-related research priorities for emergency medicine. These priorities would provide a foundation for high-quality research, important direction to both researchers and health-care funders, and an essential step in improving health-care safety and patient outcomes in the high-risk emergency department (ED) setting.MethodsA four-phase consensus procedure with a multidisciplinary expert panel was organized to identify, assess, and agree on research priorities for patient safety in emergency medicine. The 19-member panel consisted of clinicians, administrators, and researchers from adult and pediatric emergency medicine, patient safety, pharmacy, and mental health; as well as representatives from patient safety organizations. In phase 1, we developed an initial list of potential research priorities by electronically surveying a purposeful and convenience sample of patient safety experts, ED clinicians, administrators, and researchers from across North America using contact lists from multiple organizations. We used simple content analysis to remove duplication and categorize the research priorities identified by survey respondents. Our expert panel reached consensus on a final list of research priorities through an in-person meeting (phase 3) and two rounds of a modified Delphi process (phases 2 and 4).ResultsAfter phases 1 and 2, 66 unique research priorities were identified for expert panel review. At the end of phase 4, consensus was reached for 15 research priorities. These priorities represent four themes: (1) methods to identify patient safety issues (five priorities), (2) understanding human and environmental factors related to patient safety (four priorities), (3) the patient perspective (one priority), and (4) interventions for improving patient safety (five priorities).ConclusionThis study established expert, consensus-based research priorities for patient safety in emergency medicine. This framework could be used by researchers and health-care funders and represents an essential guiding step towards enhancing quality of care and patient safety in the ED.

2 keywords...

hide…