• Ann Emerg Med · Dec 1991

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Prospective study of manikin-only versus manikin and human subject endotracheal intubation training of paramedics.

    • S J Stratton, G Kane, C S Gunter, N C Wheeler, C Ableson-Ward, E Reich, F D Pratt, G Ogata, and C Gallagher.
    • Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency Paramedic Training Institute, Torrance, California.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Dec 1;20(12):1314-8.

    Study ObjectivesTo determine the effect of manikin-only training on field success of endotracheal intubation by paramedics.DesignProspective evaluation of individual field endotracheal intubation success rates for paramedics after they participated in a manikin-only or a manikin-plus-cadaver training program.Types Of ParticipantsParamedics responding to emergency calls involving adult medical or trauma victims.InterventionsAll participants were trained using a controlled manikin training program; then, half were randomly selected for additional instruction using fresh human cadavers.Measurements And Main ResultsIndividuals trained using only the manikin program had mean +/- SD individual success rates of 82 +/- 32%, and individuals who received additional cadaver training had mean individual success rates of 83 +/- 31%. Overall success rates for the two groups were 86% for the manikin-only group and 85% for the manikin-plus-cadaver-trained group. The sample size was not adequate to allow rejection of the null hypothesis.ConclusionParamedics trained in endotracheal intubation using a systematic manikin-only teaching program can attain acceptable individual success rates in the actual field setting.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…