• Mariana Gobbo Braz, Marcelo Rocha Magalhães, Daisy Maria Salvadori, Ana Lúcia Ferreira, Leandro Gobbo Braz, Eduardo Sakai, and José Reinaldo Braz.
• Department of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. mgbraz@hotmail.com
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Aug 1;26(8):654-60.

Background And ObjectivesInhaled anaesthetics have been studied regarding their genotoxic and mutagenic potential in vivo. Propofol differs from volatile anaesthetics because it does not show mutagenic effects and it has been reported to be an antioxidant. However, there are no studies with propofol and genotoxicity in vivo. The study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that propofol is not genotoxic and it inhibits lipid peroxidation [malondialdehyde (MDA)] in patients undergoing propofol anaesthesia.MethodsASA physical status I patients scheduled for elective surgery, lasting at least 90 min, were enrolled in this study. Initially, the estimated plasma concentration of propofol was targeted at 4 microg ml(-1) and then maintained at 2-4 microg ml(-1) until the end of surgery. Haemodynamic data were determined at baseline (before premedication) and in conjunction with target-controlled infusion of propofol: after tracheal intubation, 30, 60 and 90 min after anaesthesia induction and at the end of the surgery. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline, after tracheal intubation, at the end of the surgery and on the postoperative first day for evaluating DNA damage in white blood cells (WBCs), by comet assay, and MDA levels.ResultsHaemodynamic data did not differ among times. No statistically significant differences were observed for the levels of DNA damage in WBCs, nor in plasma MDA, among the four times.ConclusionPropofol does not induce DNA damage in WBCs and does not alter MDA in plasma of patients.

26 keywords...

hide…