• Dalokay Kilic, Hadi Akay, Sevket Kavukçu, Hakan Kutlay, Ayten Kayi Cangir, Serkan Enön, and Cem Kadilar.
• Department of Thoracic Surgery, Başkent University School of Medicine, Başkent University Hospital, Sokak No: 6, 01250 Yuregir Adana, Turkey.
• Surg. Today. 2005 Jan 1;35(8):634-8.

PurposeMalignant pleural effusion is a common complication of primary and metastatic pleural malignancies. It is usually managed by drainage and pleurodesis, but there is no consensus as to the best method of pleurodesis. We compared the effectiveness, side effects, and cost of different chemical pleurodesis agents used in patients with malignant pleural effusion.MethodsBetween January 1990 and December 2001, 108 patients with malignant pleural effusion underwent chemical pleurodesis in our department. Thoracoscopy was performed in 64 patients (59%), a minithoracotomy in 18 (17%), tube thoracostomy in 11 (10%), and a small-bore catheter was inserted in 15 (14%). Talc was used in 68 (63%) patients, tetracycline in 26 (24%), and bleomycin in 14 (13%). Talc was instilled by insufflation during surgery after drainage, whereas tetracycline and bleomycin were instilled via tube or catheter for pleural analgesia.ResultsTalc resulted in significantly earlier tube and catheter removal, after an average 4.1 days versus 5.1 days after tetracyline, and 6.3 days after bleomycin (P = 0.026, P = 0.001, respectively). A significantly lower reaccumulation ratio in 90 days was achieved by the talc group, with nine (13.2%) patients, representing an 86.8% success rate, than in the tetracyline and bleomycin groups, with seven (26.7%) and five (35.7%) patients, respectively, representing 73.8% and 64.3% success rates (P = 0.04).ConclusionsTalc resulted in the earliest expansion, minimal drainage, and the earliest tube and catheter removal.

25 keywords...

hide…