• Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Sep 1996

    Comparative Study

    [Ventilation via a transnasally placed pharyngeal tube. Comparison with mask ventilation].

    • M Bund, R Walz, F Logemann, W Seitz, and E Kirchner.
    • Zentrum Anästhesiologie, Abt. I der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
    • Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Sep 1;31(7):420-4.

    ObjectiveThe present prospective study was designed to investigate the respiratory function during ventilation via a tube inserted through the nose into the pharynx. Results were compared with respiratory parameters measured during conventional mask ventilation in the same patients.Methods20 ASA physical status I-II patients were studied after approval by the local Ethics Committee. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 15 micrograms/kg and propofol 2.5-3.0 mg/kg and maintained with propofol, 12-15 mg/kg/h. Patients were ventilated via a facemask with oxygen and a tidal volume of approximately 8ml/kg (measurement A). After insertion of a tube (I.D. 7.0-7.5 mm) through the nostril into the pharynx ventilation was repeated in the same manner (measurement B). To secure airway seal a second person closed the patient's mouth and exerted cricoid pressure. Following neuromuscular blockade with suxamethonium (1.5 mg/kg) respiratory parameters were measured again (C). Measurements included pulse oximetry and side stream spirometry with continuous collection of the following data: airway pressure, inspired and expired tidal volume, dynamic compliance, expired volume in one second, inspiratory and expiratory oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration. Pressure-volume and flow-volume loops were displayed continuously.ResultsVentilation via facial mask or via pharyngeal tube with and without relaxation showed normal endtidal FECO2. The mean values were 4.5 +/- 0.7%, 4.8 +/- 0.4% and 4.6 +/- 0.7%, respectively. Mean oxygen saturation exceeded 98% in each period. Leakage during mask ventilation was 59.3 +/- 65.5 mL and decreased to 40.5 +/- 62.1 mL with the pharyngeal tube, whereas relaxation resulted in a significant increase to 92.3 75.0 mL. Compliance (Cdyn) and expired volume in one second (V 1.0) did not change significantly during the entire period of measurement.ConclusionThe use of a pharyngeally placed tube proved adequate compared to conventional mask ventilation in 20 patients without underlying airway disease.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.