• Luciano Bortone, Pablo M Ingelmo, Gesù De Ninno, Michela Tosi, Laura Caffini, Juna Trenchi, Mario Mergoni, and Fabio Martorana.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Parma, Italy. lbortone@ao.pr.it
• Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Mar 1;16(3):251-7.

BackgroundThe laryngeal tube (LT) is a supraglottic ventilatory device used in adults. However, there is limited information about LT use in pediatric patients. This randomized controlled study compares LT with laryngeal mask (LMA) for airway management during spontaneous or assisted ventilation and during fiberoptic laryngoscopy in children.MethodsThirty children under 10-years old, ASA I-II, scheduled for minor general surgery, Mallampati score I-II, fasted and premedicated were included. Patients with upper respiratory infection, craniofacial malformation, intracranial hypertension, emergency surgery were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients in whom effective spontaneous or assisted ventilation [Vt > or = 4 ml.kg(-1), SpO2 > or = 95% with FiO2 0.4, P(E)CO2 < or = 7.2 kPa (55 mmHg)] was achieved after 3 min of LT or LMA cuff inflation. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients in whom fiberoptic laryngoscopy resulted in identification of the vocal cords.ResultsEleven children with LMA and two children in LT group had adequate spontaneous or assisted ventilation after initial positioning (P < 0.01). After head extension or device repositioning 15 of 15 patients in LMA group had adequate ventilation compared with 11 of 15 patients in LT group (P < 0.05). The vocal cords could be observed with fiberoptic laryngoscopy in 11 LMA group patients compared with no patients in the LT group (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe LT is less effective than the LMA to allow adequate spontaneous or assisted ventilation and for fiberoptic evaluation of the airway in children under 10 years old.

14 keywords...

hide…