• Jean-Luc Fellahi, Jean-Luc Hanouz, Jean-Louis Gérard, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Laurent Halbout, Xavier Arrot, Hélène De Facq Régent, and Dan Chelarescu.
• CHU de Caen, Pôle Réanimations - Anesthésie - SAMU, F-14000 Caen, France. Electronic address: buleon-c@chu-caen.fr.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct 1;31(10):1457-61.

PurposesCardiac arrest survival depends on celerity and efficiency of life support action. Guidelines emphasized the chest compression (CC) quality and feedback devices are encouraged. The purpose is to study the impact of the CPRmeter feedback device on resuscitation performed by untrained rescuers.Basic ProceduresThis is a prospective randomized crossover study on manikins (Resusci Anne). One hundred and forty four students inexperienced in cardiopulmonary resuscitation representing untrained rescuers were included. Participants performed 2 minutes of CC without interruption with (group G) or without (group B) feedback. Four months passed between the 2 crossover phases to avoid resilience effect. Data collected by the CPRmeter device were: CC rate, depth and release.Main FindingsEfficient CC rate ([simultaneous and correct CC rate, depth and release] primary outcome) (absolute difference [95% CI]) was significantly improved in group G (71%) compared to group B (26%; [45 {36-55}]; P < .0001). Adequate depth rate (>38 mm) was significantly improved in group G (85%) compared to group B (43%; [42 {33-52}]; P < .0001). Adequate CC rate (90-120/min) was significantly improved in group G (81%) compared to group B (56%; [25 {15-35}]; P < .0001). The average CC rate and depth in group G were significantly less dispersed around the mean compared to group B (test of variance P < .007; P < .015 respectively).Principal ConclusionsThe use of the CPRmeter significantly improved CC quality performed by students inexperienced in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.© 2013.

11 keywords...

hide…