-
Critical care medicine · May 2016
Observational StudyPharmacodynamic Analysis of a Fluid Challenge.
- Hollmann D Aya, Irina Chis Ster, Nick Fletcher, R Michael Grounds, Andrew Rhodes, and Maurizio Cecconi.
- 1General and Cardiothoracic Intensive Care unit, Adult Critical Care Directorate, St George's University Hospitals and St George's University of London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 2Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
- Crit. Care Med. 2016 May 1; 44 (5): 880-91.
ObjectiveThis study aims to describe the pharmacodynamics of a fluid challenge over a 10-minute period in postoperative patients.DesignProspective observational study.SettingGeneral and cardiothoracic ICU, tertiary hospital.PatientsTwenty-six postoperative patients.InterventionTwo hundred and fifty-milliliter fluid challenge performed over 5 minutes. Data were recorded over 10 minutes after the end of fluid infusionMeasurements And Main ResultsCardiac output was measured with a calibrated LiDCOplus (LiDCO, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and Navigator (Applied Physiology, Sydney, Australia) to obtain the Pmsf analogue (Pmsa). Pharmacodynamics outcomes were modeled using a Bayesian inferential approach and Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation methods. Parameter estimates were summarized as the means of their posterior distributions, and their uncertainty was assessed by the 95% credible intervals. Bayesian probabilities for groups' effect were also derived. The predicted maximal effect on cardiac output was observed at 1.2 minutes (95% credible interval, -0.6 to 2.8 min) in responders. The probability that the estimated area under the curve of central venous pressure was smaller in nonresponders was 0.12. (estimated difference, -4.91 mm Hg·min [95% credible interval, -13.45 to 3.3 mm Hg min]). After 10 minutes, there is no evidence of a difference between groups for any hemodynamic variable.ConclusionsThe maximal change in cardiac output should be assessed 1 minute after the end of the fluid infusion. The global effect of the fluid challenge on central venous pressure is greater in nonresponders, but not the change observed 10 minutes after the fluid infusion. The effect of a fluid challenge on hemodynamics is dissipated in 10 minutes similarly in both groups.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.