• Shahram Bolandparvaz, Sepideh Sefidbakht, Payman Moharamzadeh, Kazem Jamali, Mahboob Pouraghaei, Maryam Fadaie, and Kavous Shahsavari.
• Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov 1;31(11):1583-5.

IntroductionLong bone fractures are currently diagnosed using radiography, but radiography has some disadvantages (radiation and being time consuming). The present study compared the diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound and radiography in multiple trauma patients at the emergency department (ED).MethodThe study assessed 80 injured patients with multiple trauma from February 2011 to July 2012. The patients were older than 18 years and triaged to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation ward of the ED. Bedside ultrasound and radiography were conducted for them. The findings were separately and blindly assessed by 2 radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, the positive and negative predictive value, and κ coefficient were measured to assess the accuracy and validity of ultrasound as compared with radiography.ResultsThe sensitivity of ultrasound for diagnosis of limb bone fractures was not high enough and ranged between 55% and 75% depending on the fracture site. The specificity of this diagnostic method had an acceptable range of 62% to 84%. Ultrasound negative prediction value was higher than other indices under study and ranged between 73% and 83%, but its positive prediction value varied between 33.3% and 71%. The κ coefficient for diagnosis of long bone fractures of upper limb (κ = 0.58) and upper limb joints (κ = 0.47) and long bones of lower limb (κ = 0.52) was within the medium range. However, the value for diagnosing fractures of lower limb joints (κ = 0.47) was relatively low.ConclusionBedside ultrasound is not a reliable method for diagnosing fractures of upper and lower limb bones compared with radiography.© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

21 keywords...

hide…