-
- Young Hwan Lee, Young Taeck Oh, Hee Cheol Ahn, Hyoung Soo Kim, Sang Jin Han, Jae Jun Lee, Tae Hun Lee, Jeong Yeol Seo, Dong Hyuk Shin, Sang Ook Ha, and Sang O Park.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea; Department of emergency medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon 200-701, Republic of Korea.
- Resuscitation. 2016 Feb 1; 99: 50-5.
AimThe grey-to-white matter ratio (GWR) is a reliable predictor of the neurological outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the reliability in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) remains unknown. We evaluated the utility of the GWR in predicting neurological outcomes in ECPR-treated patients.MethodsThis single-centre retrospective study was conducted from July 2009 to January 2014. Patients who received ECPR for OHCA were classified into two groups: Cerebral performance category(CPC) 1-2 was defined as good, CPC 3-5 as poor outcome. Four GWR (GWR-AV[average], GWR-CO[cortex], GWR-BG[basal ganglia], and GWR-SI [simplified])were evaluated and compared between the groups.ResultsOf 38 patients who received ECPR for OHCA, 30 patients were enrolled. Five (16.7%) had a good outcome and 25(83.3%) a poor outcome. All GWR were significantly higher in the good outcome group than in the poor outcome group. ROC curve analysis produced the following areas under the curve: GWR-AV=0.920 (95% CI 0.761 to 0.987), GWR-BG=0.872 (95%CI 0.699 to 0.965), GWR-CO=0.952 (95% CI 0.806 to 0.997), and GWR-SI=0.848(95% CI 0.670 to 0.962). The cut-off value with 100% specificity for the prediction of the poor outcome was 1.23 for GWR-AV (sensitivity: 76%), 1.24 for GWR-BG (sensitivity: 88.0%), 1.22 for GWR-CO (sensitivity: 64%), and 1.21 for GWR-SI (sensitivity: 76%).ConclusionsIn ECPR, GWR of patients with poor outcome was significantly lower than that of patients with good outcome.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.