• Masui · Jun 2009

    Comparative Study

    [Endotracheal tube selection in children: which is the better predictor for the selection, tracheal internal diameter in X-ray photograph or age-based formula?].

    • Atsushi Furuya, Hidehiko Nomura, Genya Kuroiwa, Fumimasa Tamaki, Satomi Suzuki, Akihiko Nonaka, Fumiaki Abe, and Takashi Matsukawa.
    • Division of Anesthesiology, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Kofu.
    • Masui. 2009 Jun 1;58(6):724-7.

    BackgroundAge-based formula has been widely used to predict the appropriate size of the endotracheal tube in children. Tracheal internal diameter in X-ray photograph is reported to show higher correlation with a correct tube than age. In our institution, X-ray photographs were stored as digital images, enabling us to measure tracheal internal diameters more accurately than conventional X-ray films. Therefore, we investigated whether tracheal size in digital X-ray photograph is a better predictor for the tube selection than age.MethodsWe reviewed data from children aged 1 to 8 years for the past 5 years. The data included age, tracheal internal diameter at 6th cervical (C6), 2nd thoracic vertebrae (T2) in X-ray photograph and selected tube size. The tube size was estimated by the age-based formula or on the basis of tracheal size.ResultsThe endotracheal tube size correlated significantly with the age, and tracheal internal diameter at C6 or T2 in X-ray photograph (correlation coefficients P=0.898, 0.653, and 0.771 respectively; P<0.0001). The tube size predicted by the age allowed appropriate intubation in 62.2%, but that by the tracheal size at C6 and T2 in 42.8% and 43.7% respectively.ConclusionsThe age-based formula is more reliable and appropriate to decide the size of endotracheal tube for children than the tracheal size.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.