• J Comput Assist Tomogr · Jul 2010

    Computed tomography features of extensively drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in non-HIV-infected patients.

    • Eun Sun Lee, Chang Min Park, Jin Mo Goo, Jae-Joon Yim, Hye-Ryoun Kim, Hyun Ju Lee, In Sun Lee, and Jung-Gi Im.
    • Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Korea.
    • J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Jul 1;34(4):559-63.

    ObjectiveTo describe the computed tomography (CT) findings of pulmonary extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in non-HIV-infected patients and to compare them with those of non-XDR multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).MethodsRetrospective review of microbiological results and drug-susceptibility tests of 260 non-HIV-infected patients who had been diagnosed with pulmonary MDR-TB from 1994 to 2005 revealed that 47 patients had XDR-TB, whereas the other 213 patients had non-XDR MDR-TB. Twenty of the 47 XDR-TB patients and 85 of the 213 non-XDR MDR-TB patients with available CT examinations were included in this study. Two radiologists reviewed the CT studies in consensus for the presence and extent of micronodules, tree-in-bud appearance, lobular consolidation (<2 cm), consolidation, cavity, bronchiectasis, emphysema, pleural effusion, lymphadenopathy, bronchopleural fistula, and empyema. We then compared the CT features of XDR-TB with those of non-XDR MDR-TB.ResultsMicronodules and tree-in-bud appearance were the most frequent CT abnormalities and were seen in all XDR-TB patients (100%). Consolidations, cavities, bronchiectasis, and lobular consolidations were found in 85%, 85%, 80%, and 70% of XDR-TB patients, respectively. The extents of micronodules, tree-in-bud appearance, lobular consolidation, consolidation, cavity, bronchiectasis, and emphysema were 3.60, 3.55, 1.35, 1.85, 1.65, 1.45, and 0.25 lobes, respectively. Compared with non-XDR MDR-TB, XDR-TB showed a significantly larger extent of tree-in-bud appearance and consolidation (P < 0.05). With respect to other CT features, there were no significant differences between XDR-TB and non-XDR MDR-TB.ConclusionComputed tomography findings of pulmonary XDR-TB are similar to those of non-XDR MDR-TB; however, XDR-TB tends to have more extensive consolidation and tree-in-bud appearance.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…