• Masui · Jul 2009

    Comparative Study

    [Comparison of Cormack/Lehane classification grades decided by novice residents and those by board certified anesthesiologists].

    • Hiromi Shibuya, Eizo Amano, Aya Konishi, Rika Nogawa, Kazuaki Hitomi, and Takahiko Hirata.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka 540-0006.
    • Masui. 2009 Jul 1;58(7):917-21.

    BackgroundTracheal intubation training is one of the most important ones in anesthesia training. But it is difficult to evaluate from the outside whether the laryngeal view obtained with the laryngoscope is appropriate or not.MethodsWe chose a total of 389 cases of tracheal intubation performed by 12 novice residents in 2 months, and compared the grades of Cormack/Lehane classification of the same patients decided by novice residents and board certified anesthesiologists.ResultsDuring the 2-month period, the average number of tracheal intubation performed by a novice resident was 32 +/- 12 cases (mean +/- SD). A significant difference was found between Cormack/Lehane classification (P<0.05) decided by novice residents and those by board certified anesthesiologists. When the number of intubation performed by a novice resident was fewer than 30, the grade was grade II > III > I > IV. On the contrary, when it was more than 30, the ratio of grades I and II (appropriate laryngeal view) increased and the distribution changed to grade II > I >III > IV.ConclusionsWe considered it useful in the tracheal intubation training that certified anesthesiologists evaluate patients' Cormack/Lehane classification grades before novice residents do, because we can obtain necessary information on laryngeal view and intubation difficulty in advance.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.