-
Comparative Study
Levosimendan improves postresuscitation outcomes in a rat model of CPR.
- Lei Huang, Max Harry Weil, Shijie Sun, Gianluca Cammarata, Lan Cao, and Wanchun Tang.
- Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270, USA. weilm@911research.org
- J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2005 Nov 1;146(5):256-61.
AbstractIn this study we sought to determine whether a calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, would have a more favorable effect on postresuscitation myocardial function and, consequently, postresuscitation survival than beta-adrenergic dobutamine. The extreme decrease in survival before hospital discharge of resuscitated victims is attributed, in part, to postresuscitation myocardial failure, and dobutamine has been recommended for the management of postresuscitation myocardial failure. We studied a total of 15 animals. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 450 to 550 g. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including chest compressions and mechanical ventilation, was begun after 8 minutes of untreated cardiac arrest. Electrical defibrillation was attempted after 6 minutes of CPR. Each animal was resuscitated. Animals were randomized to undergo treatment with levosimendan, dobutamine, or saline-solution placebo. These agents were administered 10 minutes after the return of spontaneous circulation. Levosimendan was administered in a loading dose of 12 microg kg(-1) over a 10-minute period, followed by infusion of 0.3 microg kg(-1) min(-1) over the next 230 minutes. Dobutamine was continuously infused at a dosage of 3 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Saline-solution placebo was administered in the same volume and over the same amount of time as levosimendan. Levosimendan and dobutamine produced comparable increases in cardiac output and rate of left-ventricular pressure increase. However, administration of levosimendan resulted in lower heart rates and lesser increases in left ventricular diastolic pressure compared with both dobutamine and placebo. The duration of postresuscitation survival was significantly greater with levosimendan (16 +/- 2 hours), intermediate with dobutamine (11 +/- 2 hours) and least with saline-solution placebo (8 +/- 1 hour). Levosimendan and dobutamine both improved postresuscitation myocardial function. However, levosimendan produced more favorable postresuscitation myocardial function and increased the duration of postresuscitation survival.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.