• Jan-Peter Braun, Hendrik Mende, Hanswerner Bause, Frank Bloos, Götz Geldner, Marc Kastrup, Ralf Kuhlen, Andreas Markewitz, Jörg Martin, Michael Quintel, Klaus Steinmeier-Bauer, Christian Waydhas, Claudia Spies, and NeQuI (quality network in intensive care medicine).
• Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
• Ger Med Sci. 2010 Jan 1;8:Doc22.

AbstractIn order to improve quality (of therapy), one has to know, evaluate and make transparent, one's own daily processes. This process of reflection can be supported by the presentation of key data or indicators, in which the real as-is state can be represented. Quality indicators are required in order to depict the as-is state.Quality indicators reflect adherence to specific quality measures. Continuing registration of an indicator is useless once it becomes irrelevant or adherence is 100%. In the field of intensive care medicine, studies of quality indicators have been performed in some countries. Quality indicators relevant for medical quality and outcome in critically ill patients have been identified by following standardized approaches.Different German societies of intensive care medicine have finally agreed on 10 core quality indicators that will be valid for two years and are currently recommended in German intensive care units (ICUs).

15 keywords...

hide…